fddcsjxk

← CHALLONGE! Feedback & Support

My feedback

  1. Allow A Fixed Number of Rounds for Swiss Events, Even If Less Than Minimum Needed for Winner

    16 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    fddcsjxk commented  · 

    Huge agree. There's no logic in the number of rounds that Challonge forces, anyways- it's fine without there being a clear winner, but we're still expected to run a minimum number of rounds based on entrants??

    fddcsjxk supported this idea  · 

  2. Swiss for the first stage in two stage format

    570 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    59 comments  ·  Feature Requests  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    fddcsjxk commented  · 

    Huge amounts of spam, so I doubt this will be seen. A workaround could easily be implemented that simply allows us to end Swiss brackets with any amount of rounds that we choose. I'm running a 100-person tournament that I'm happy ending with a top 10, but I can't choose to end the tournament with 6 rounds played. It wants me to have a 7th round even though I've determined all the winners I need.

    fddcsjxk supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)